PRASHANT BHUSHAN: CONTEMPT OF COURT
T he Author of this blog is Ms. Mauli Bisen, a student of 2nd year at LNCT University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh In 1983 the statement “Criticism of the judiciary in all functional democracies is treated as a legitimate exercise of free speech” was made in context of the British Judicial Establishment in India. Affront the judges and questioning the judiciary was reviewed as obstruction to the administration of justice. Nevertheless, over the past 80 years this law has been practised in England. So, the law commission suggested its abolition in 2012. Through the Crime and Courts Acts 2013 it took place. According to the commission, this law violates the right to freedom of expression and this can’t be retained unless a strong justified principle lies with it. Also, that the conditions for committing this offence are uncertain. However, in English jurisprudence insulting judiciary is unkind and unacceptable but the criticism for the public interest in good faith is not an offence. Re