Epidemic vs. Pandemic: Sufficient or not to address the challenges
Abhavya Rabra
Author of this article is a Law Student, School of Law, Jagran Lakecity University, Bhopal
“Natural Forces within us
are the true healers of disease.”
An epidemic disease is one which affects many persons at the same time,
and spreads from person to person in a locality where the disease is not
permanently prevalent. The World Health Organization (WHO) further
specifies epidemic as occurring at the
level of a region or community. The ‘–demic’ part of epidemic and pandemic comes
from the Greek demos,
which means people of a district. On the other hand pandemic
as compared to an epidemic disease,
a pandemic disease is an epidemic that has spread over a
large area, that is, it is prevalent throughout an entire country, continent,
or the whole world. In layman’s language epidemics is spreading of an
infectious disease in a community whereas pandemic is worldwide spreading of
disease.
India has witnessed many large outbreaks of emerging and re-emerging
infectious diseases in the recent past as of now . The outbreak of a cholera
epidemic due to the O139 strain in 1992, that of plague in Surat in 1994, the
large-scale spread of Chikungunya and dengue fever, and that of avian influenza
(H5N1) and pandemic H1N1 influenza were some which caused widespread havoc. As
in any other country, diseases with the potential for international spread,
such as Ebola virus disease and Zika virus, also pose threats to the public
health.
Legal frameworks are important during emergency situations as they can
delineate the scope of the government’s responses to public health emergencies
and also, the duties and rights of citizens. In recent years, many states in
India have invoked various provisions of the Epidemic Diseases Act of 1897 to
force H1N1-affected persons to be segregated and get them treated at recognised
hospitals and to set up isolation facilities for the public. It is important to
evaluate the Epidemic Diseases Act of 1897 with its relevance in the current
context and whether it has kept up with the recent global developments in
disease surveillance, control and rights perspective.
Description of the
Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897
The Epidemic Diseases Act was passe with the aim of better preventing
the spread of “dangerous epidemic diseases”[1].
It evolved to tackle the epidemic of bubonic plague that broke out in the then
Bombay state at the time. The Governor General of colonial India conferred
special powers upon the local authorities to implement the measures necessary
for the control of epidemics.
The Epidemic Diseases Act is one of the shortest Acts in India,
comprising just four sections. The first section explains the title and the
extent, while the second gives powers to the state and Central governments to
take special measures and formulate regulations that are to be observed by the
people to contain the spread of disease. The third section describes penalties
for violating the regulations, in accordance with Section 188 of the Indian
Penal Code. The fourth deals with legal protection to the implementing officers
acting under the Act (5).
According to the provisions of Section 2 of the Act, which describes the
powers of the government, “When the state government is satisfied that the
state or any part thereof is visited by or threatened with an outbreak of any
dangerous epidemic disease; and if it thinks that the ordinary provisions of
the law are insufficient for the purpose, then the state may take, or require
or empower any person to take some measures and by public notice prescribe such
temporary regulations to be observed by the public. The state government may
prescribe regulations for inspection of persons travelling by railway or
otherwise, and the segregation, in hospital, temporary accommodation or
otherwise, of persons suspected by the inspecting officer of being infected
with any such disease.” (5: p 2). Section 2A empowers the Central
government to inspect any ship leaving or arriving at any port and for
detention thereof, or of any person intending to sail therein, or arriving
thereby. Section 3 states, “Six months’ imprisonment or 1,000 rupees fine or
both could be charged out to the person who disobeys this Act.”
The Act was executed vigorously to control the plague epidemic that
broke out in the 1890s . The powers it conferred were invoked to search for
suspected plague cases in homes and among passengers. There was forcible
segregation of affected persons, disinfections, evacuation, and demolition of
infected places. The assembly of crowds was prevented, public meetings and
festivals were banned and pilgrimages suspended in order to avoid the
consequences. Alleged humiliation of and violence against women gave rise to
concerns among the citizens, and riots were reported in some areas. In many
places, military powers were used to ensure the proper implementation of the
preventive measures.
Limitations of the
Epidemic Diseases Act in the changed context
The factors leading to the
emergence and spread of communicable diseases have also changed and thus hold major
limitations in this era of changing priorities in public health emergency
management. Some factors that need to be addressed, now are the increasing
rates of international travel, more extensive use of air travel compared to sea
travel, greater migration within states for the sake of earning a livelihood,
increased urbanization, grossly increased density of populations in certain
areas, increasing intensity of contact, man-made ecological changes, changing
climatic conditions, technologies of mass food production, breakdown of public
measures and bio-safety lapses. The Epidemic Diseases Act needs modifications
in the changing scenario. As it mainly oriented towards travel by ship and
silent on air travel, which was uncommon at that time. The epidemiological
concepts used in relation to the prevention and control of epidemic diseases
have also changed over time. This Act is not in line with the contemporary
scientific understanding of outbreak prevention and response, but only reflects
the scientific and legal standards that prevailed at the time when it was
framed. The Act places too much emphasis on isolation or quarantine measures,
but is silent on the other scientific methods of outbreak prevention and
control, such as vaccination, surveillance and organised public health
response. This Act as such, is not sufficient to deal with the prevention and
control of communicable disease in the current situation. Therefore this Act of
1897 is quite quandary in nature.
Dangerous
epidemic disease as the definition of it is nowhere provided in the Act. There is no clear
definition of whether an epidemic is dangerous on the basis of the magnitude of
the problem, the severity of the problem, the age of the population affected or
it’s potential to spread internationally. It is very essential to know what a
“dangerously epidemic disease” is and what criteria the meaning is based on, if
one prevents misuse of the Act and also for transparency.
In the case of Devarshi Pragneshbhai Patel v State of
Gujarat[2],the respondent authorities
are, by way of preventive measures, providing the vaccine for swine flu free of
cost to the intended beneficiaries as per the guidelines issued by the Ministry
of Health and Family Welfare. More than 2000 health care workers and doctors,
involved in treatment of such patients are vaccinated with Influenza A H1N1
vaccines free of cost and not at the subsidized rate and for curing this kind
of complications, one has to go for curative measures like Early Diagnoses and
Prompt Treatment (EDPT) by taking medicine which is dispensed as capsule
Oseltamivir, which holds potent anti-virus properties and if taken within 48
hours of manifestation of symptoms of A H1N1, it works as magic bullet and more
than 90% of the viral load of the patients gets decreased in just 3-4 doses and
will get cured within five days. The medicines are provided free of cost by the
State Government. The court stated that the State Government has taken very
effective methods and they may continue with the same and the manner in which
the State Government has taken steps to prevent and control swine flu
shows that it is interested in the welfare of the people of Gujarat. In
the case of Justice Brigad vs Union of India and Ors[3]
the Union Cabinet Secretary has directed all the States and Union
Territories to invoke Section 2 of
the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897. Submissions made that when
the Essential Commodities such as masks, sanitizers etc, are sold by the medical shops, at exorbitant rates, taking advantage of the prevailing situation, in the State of Kerala, Government of Kerala should be directed to respond forthwith and take adequate measures for control of the price of such essential commodities, and to ensure that the same is easily available to the public. The Collector, administered the respondents to take measures to control the price rise of the essential commodities and ensure adequate supply of the said commodities in the State of Kerala.
Addressing Challenges
When an influenza pandemic emerges, all countries worldwide will
inevitably have it’s affect. However, the impact may vary both between and
within countries which leads to several factors including lack of access to
adequate medical care, weak public health infrastructures, social factors such
as housing conditions and population density, and host factors such as
nutritional status and co-existing medical conditions and several possible
interventions can be implemented to control or mitigate the effects of an influenza
pandemic, which include pharmaceutical interventions such as vaccines, and non-pharmaceutical
interventions such as quarantine, isolation, social distancing, and personal
hygiene.
Pharmaceutical interventions are needed for mitigating the impact of an
influenza pandemic. During an influenza pandemic, essential medical supplies such
as gloves, masks, syringes, antipyretics, and antimicrobial agents will also be
required in order to ensure safety. These supplies are though insufficient in
healthcare facilities in developing countries, even in non-emergency situations
as lack of these supplies may hamper provision of adequate medical care for
patients with pandemic influenza. Basic protective equipment such as disposable
gloves and surgical masks are needed for protecting healthcare workers. In
countries with limited healthcare resources, providing routine medical care for
other conditions may become difficult during a pandemic. As the health
consequences of a pandemic, including deaths, can substantially be reduced by providing better medical care.
Individuals can
also take preventive measures of their own, including regularly washing their
hands, covering their sneezes, and wiping down surfaces. As current scenario, of COVID-19
intersects with the underlying inequality crisis that was already fragmenting
our societies and creating an age of anger. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is
an infectious disease caused by a newly discovered coronavirus. Most people throughout
the world infected with the COVID-19 virus will experience mild to moderate
respiratory illness and recover without requiring special treatment.
Older people and those with underlying medical problems like cardiovascular
disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, and cancer are more likely to
develop serious illness.
Conclusion
There is a need to strengthen legal frameworks to prevent and control
the entry, spread and existence of communicable diseases in India. The Epidemic
Diseases Act 1897, which is more than a century old, has major limitations when
it comes to tackling the emergence and re-emergence of communicable diseases in
the country, especially in the changing public health context. There is a need
for an integrated, comprehensive, actionable and relevant legal provision for
the control of outbreaks in India that should be articulated in a rights-based,
people-focused and public health-oriented manner.
[1]
https://indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/10469/1/the_epidemic_diseases_act%2C_1897.pdf
accessed on 30/03/2020.
[2] 26 February, 2015
[3] WP(C).No.8260
OF 2020(S)
Congrats n all the best
ReplyDeletethanks
Delete